<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is This Innovation Too Disruptive for My Firm?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sviokla.com/design/is-this-innovation-too-disruptive-for-my-firm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sviokla.com/design/is-this-innovation-too-disruptive-for-my-firm/</link>
	<description>Innovation: past, present and future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:14:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Vollbrecht</title>
		<link>http://www.sviokla.com/design/is-this-innovation-too-disruptive-for-my-firm/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Vollbrecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sviokla.com/design/is-this-innovation-too-disruptive-for-my-firm/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>John, I certainly follow your logic, but I think it is perhaps a bit too broad as an all encompassing framework. Perhaps (or perhaps not) for the New York Times, a Craig&#039;s List model would not work. On the other hand, regional and local newspapers are falling like flies; they either have to get online or face a virtual certitude of failure (see www.matchbin.com).

Look, also, at the 3M model where innovation is their entire lifeblood. Indeed, large percentages of each operating unit&#039;s revenues must come from new products, some of which come from seemingly dubious concepts. The most well known of these is the Post It Note.

Innovation is a tricky thing. Remain a cash cow too long and become irrelevant. Innovate too fast and never reach profitability. Jim Collin&#039;s writing on innovation comes to mind, whereby there needs to be an underlying &quot;purpose&quot; the company rallies around. This, according to Collins, needs to be the litmus test for the compatibility of innovation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I certainly follow your logic, but I think it is perhaps a bit too broad as an all encompassing framework. Perhaps (or perhaps not) for the New York Times, a Craig&#8217;s List model would not work. On the other hand, regional and local newspapers are falling like flies; they either have to get online or face a virtual certitude of failure (see <a href="http://www.matchbin.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.matchbin.com</a>).</p>
<p>Look, also, at the 3M model where innovation is their entire lifeblood. Indeed, large percentages of each operating unit&#8217;s revenues must come from new products, some of which come from seemingly dubious concepts. The most well known of these is the Post It Note.</p>
<p>Innovation is a tricky thing. Remain a cash cow too long and become irrelevant. Innovate too fast and never reach profitability. Jim Collin&#8217;s writing on innovation comes to mind, whereby there needs to be an underlying &#8220;purpose&#8221; the company rallies around. This, according to Collins, needs to be the litmus test for the compatibility of innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

